Ernie Shore’s “Perfect” Game and Babe Ruth’s Ejection in 1917

The Boston Globe covered this game with as much attention to the fracas that got Babe Ruth ejected after walking the first batter as to Ernie Shore’s feat of retiring the 26 batters he faced in relief, which, with the first batter being thrown out stealing, made 27 straight outs, if not quite an absolute perfect game. It happened at Fenway Park on June 23, 1917, in the first game of a doubleheader vs. the Washington Senators. Here’s most of the Globe’s account:

FAME FOR SHORE, SOX IN TWIN WIN
No-Hit, No-Run and No-Man-to-First Performance
Modest Ernie Shore took a place in the Hall of Fame as a no-hit, no-run, no man-reached-first base pitcher in the curtain-raiser of the twin bill with the Griffmen at Fenway Park yesterday. It was the best pitching seen in this city since 1904 when Cy Young put over a similar feat, the only difference being that Uncle Cyrus pitched to every batter, while the Carolina professor did not get into the exercises until after Ruth, who had walked Morgan, the first batter, had been removed from the pastime for striking Umpire Brick Owns. . .

While Shore covered himself with glory. . . Baltimore Babe with his temper beyond control went to the dugout under a cloud and undoubtedly will be severely punished by Pres Johnson.

His suspension will cripple the Red Sox badly as they need the big portsider very much.
Babe pitched four balls to Morgan and accused Owens of missing two of them. “Get in there and pitch,” ordered Owens.

“Open your eyes and keep them open,” chirped Babe.

“Get in and pitch or I will run you out of there,” was the comeback of the arbiter.
“You run me out and I will come in and bust you on the nose,” Ruth threatened.

“Get out of there now,” said Brick.

Then in rushed Ruth. Chester Thomas tried to prevent him from reaching Owens, who had not removed his mask, but Babe started swinging both hands. The left missed the arbiter, but the right struck him behind the left ear.

Manager Barry and several policemen had to drag Ruth off the field. All season Babe has been fussing a lot. Nothing has seemed to satisfy him.

Prof Shore stepped to the hill and, after Sam Agnew had taken care of Morgan when he endeavored to annex second, Ernie just breezed along calmly. He fielded his position well and was ready for any of those cantankerous bunts that the opponents might try to lay down. But strange to say the Griffmen were off that stuff, relying mostly on the slam-bang system.

The Carolinian is indebted to Scotty [shortstop Everett Scott] and Duffy Lewis for making his record. The Bluffton Kid robbed Jamieson of a hit in the fifth when a hard hit ball was deflected by Shore, Scotty being obliged to travel fast. However, he made a one hand pick-up and tossed out the runner. In the seventh “Duff” went back to his own little cliff for a bang from Morgan and in the final frame came in like lightning and speared one that Henry had planted in short left.

Shore fanned only two and it did not seem as if he was working hard. He made a number of nifty plays himself. Barry closed the game with a grand play on a swinging bunt by pinch hitter Menoskey.

Here’s the Globe’s box score:

And the headline:

Published in: on March 28, 2011 at 2:32 pm  Comments (5)  
Tags: , ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://miscbaseball.wordpress.com/2011/03/28/ernie-shores-perfect-game-and-babe-ruths-ejection-in-1917/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

5 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. I noticed that Shore also had two hits of his own in the game. That’s one helluva performance.

  2. @William Miller — Shore didn’t have any hits. The “two hits” you see are actually putouts (which is why the number below his 2 adds up to 27). The hits column in this box score is to the left.

  3. It looks like Shore did score a run though, either on a walk or after a fielder’s choice. For anyone who has trouble reading it, the box score covers at-bats, base hits, put outs, and assists, in that order. This seems to be the just about universal practice at the time.

  4. I question the authenticity of the newspaper account, or that it was embellished. The baseball Hall of Fame didn’t exist when this incident took place, as it wasn’t established until 1936, so how could Shore “take a place in the Hall of Fame” in 1917? And Ruth was a charter member.

  5. I noticed the “Hall of Fame” phrase when I was typing out the game account. I have to assume concepts of a Hall of Fame, whether for baseball or for sports or for celebrities of various kinds, were around in 1917, and just because there wasn’t an actual Hall of Fame yet didn’t mean that it didn’t exist as an idea.


Leave a comment